Dutch Safety Board: Russian Buk missile downed MH17 in Ukraine

World Today

Netherlands Ukraine Plane MH17 The reconstructed cockpit of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 plane is seen prior to the presentation of the Dutch Safety Board presents the board’s final report into what caused Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 to break up high over Eastern Ukraine last year, killing all 298 people on board, during a press conference in Gilze-Rijen, central Netherlands, Tuesday, Oct. 13, 2015. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte called on Russia to fully cooperate with the criminal investigation into who is responsible for the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 with 298 people onboard.

The comments followed the publication earlier on Tuesday (October 13) of a final report by the Dutch Safety Board into the crash. It concluded that MH17 was brought down by a Russian-made Buk missile, fired from rebel-held territory in eastern Ukraine.


Report: MH17 hit by Russian-made missile

CCTV America’s Guy Henderson has more from the Netherlands.

MH17 hit by Russian-made missile

MH17 hit by Russian-made missile

CCTV America's Guy Henderson has more from the Netherlands.

The missile that downed MH17 exploded less than a meter from the cockpit, killing the crew inside instantly and breaking off the front of the plane, the Dutch Safety Board said Tuesday as it presented the results of an official probe into the crash in eastern Ukraine.

Cause of MH17 crash by Dutch Safety Board

Cause of MH17 crash by Dutch Safety Board


The crash of flight MH17 on 17 July 2014 was caused by the detonation of a 9N314M-type warhead launched from the eastern part of Ukraine using a Buk missile system. So says the investigation report published by the Dutch Safety Board

It added that the tragedy that killed all 298 people aboard the plane on July 17, 2014, wouldn’t have happened if anyone had thought to close the airspace of eastern Ukraine to passenger planes as fighting raged below.

However, a Russian state-controlled missile-maker said on Tuesday its investigation of last year’s crash contradicts conclusions from the Dutch probe.


Expert: Flight path should not have flown through area

For more on the Dutch findings, CCTV America’s Elaine Reyes spoke to aviation analyst Captain Tom Bunn. He is also the author of SOAR.

Expert- Flight path should not have flown through area

Expert- Flight path should not have flown through area

For more on the Dutch findings, CCTV America's Elaine Reyes spoke to aviation analyst Captain Tom Bunn. He is also the author of SOAR.

MORE COVERAGE OF MH17 on CCTV AMERICA

During a news conference in Moscow on Tuesday, Almaz-Antey said it conducted two experiments – in one of which a Buk missile was detonated near the nose of an airplane similar to a 777 – that contradict that conclusion. Footage of the experiments were shown to the media at Tuesday’s news conference.

Meanwhile, the report from Dutch Safety Board did not consider who launched the missile. However, it identified an area of 320 square kilometers from which the launch must have taken place. All the territory within the area was in rebel separatist hands at the time of the crash.

Safety Board chairman Tjibbe Joustra said the 15-month investigation found the warhead was that used on a Buk surface-to-air missile system.

Joustra said that Ukraine authorities had “sufficient reason” to completely close the airspace in that area, but “nobody gave a thought” to the possible threat to civil aviation.

Missile fragments found in the cockpit crew’s bodies, as well as paint traces, enabled investigators to identify the Buk, Joustra said.

The investigation found that the missile killed the three crew in the cockpit instantly, while the passengers and other crew died due to reduced oxygen levels, extreme cold, powerful airflow and flying objects as the plane broke up and crashed.

Timeline of MH17 crash by Dutch Safety Board

Timeline of MH17 crash by Dutch Safety Board

In response to the crash of flight MH17 the Dutch Safety Board has conducted various investigations, which have been published in two reports.

The investigators unveiled a ghostly reconstruction of the forward section of MH17. Some of the nose, cockpit and business class of the Boeing 777 were rebuilt from fragments of the aircraft recovered from the crash scene and flown to Gilze-Rijen air base in southern Netherlands.

On Tuesday in the village of Hrabove where the jet came down, Lyudmila Grigoryak — whose house was the closest to the crash site — brought red carnations to the field of dry grass where small pieces of the fuselage are still scattered.

Unlike a year and a half ago when heavy fighting was just nearby, the area is quiet and deserted. All the camouflaged rebels who were patrolling the area and manning the checkpoints are gone.

Hours before the report was released, the missile’s Russian maker presented its own report trying to clear the separatists, and Russia itself, of any involvement in the disaster.

Almaz-Antey contended that its experiments — in one of which a Buk missile was detonated near the nose of an airplane similar to a 777 — contradict that conclusion.

The experimental aircraft’s remains showed a much different submunitions damage pattern than seen on the remnants of MH17, the company said in a statement.

It said the experiments also refute claims that the missile was fired from Snizhne, a village that was under rebel control. An Associated Press reporter saw a Buk missile system in that vicinity on the same day.

Almaz-Antey in June had said that a preliminary investigation suggested that the plane was downed by a model of Buk that is no longer in service with the Russian military but that was part of the Ukrainian military arsenal.

Information from the first experiment, in which a missile was fired at aluminum sheets mimicking an airliner’s fuselage, was presented to the Dutch investigators, but was not taken into account, Almaz-Antey chief Novikov said.

Novikov said evidence shows that if the plane was hit by a Buk, it was fired from the village of Zaroshenske, which Russia says was under Ukrainian government control at the time. When pressed by a journalist on Tuesday about the reports that Zaroshenske was in fact in rebel hands at the time of the crash, Novikov said it was outside his competence to comment on “who occupied what” at the time.

Many reports, including an investigation by the open-source group Bellingcat, also suggest the plane was downed by a missile fired from near Snizhne.

Story compiled with information from Reuters and The Associated Press.

  • 0not_nostradamus0

    So both agreed it was, technically then the victims’ fault, they were in the wrong place at the ‘right’ time, what the what was all of that for then, yup war is hell specially for those not “particularly involved”?!? Suffice it to say … may they rest in peace as they’re safe now from any of humanitys’ inanities … God rest their souls!!!

  • jleonidas

    So sad that this happened. But the truth should be out.

  • James Beckham

    This has been obvious since last year.

  • Человек

    The name of this article, wrote a moral monster, it’s anti-Russian propaganda. This is really CCTV? It seems this insane ukroTV.